1 2 3 4 5
Welcome to PhenomForever.com! You'r longest running resource for WWE Superstar The Undertaker. Celebrating 10 years online, we continue to bring you all the latest news and media throughout the weeks. We recently suffered a total data loss so bear with us!
The Undertaker is one of the most revered, legendary superstars in wrestling. Celebrating over 2 decades in the business, find out more here!
Hosted by
Quick Bio

The Undertaker is an American professional wrestler signed to WWE. He is the company's most tenured performer, and he's also the only remaining active competitor from the very first episode of WWE Raw in 1993. Calaway began his wrestling career with World Class Championship Wrestling (WCCW) in 1984. In 1990, Calaway signed with the World Wrestling Federation and The Undertaker was born. The rest, as they say, was history!
Fan Forum

The Fan Forums are Back! Head on over to participate in Undertaker discussion and much much more!
Official Links
  • WWE.com
  • Undertaker Official Profile
  • Undertaker Official Videos
  • Undertaker @ WWEShop.com
  • SyFy.com
  • Undertaker DOES NOT have a Twitter/Facebook or other internet profile, any you may find should be reported as fakes no matter how convincing they appear to be.
  • WWE Shop
  • Dean-Ambrose.Net
    Approved resource for Dean Ambrose
  • Officially-Emma.Com
    Official Fansite of NXT Diva Emma
  • MichelleMcCool.Net
    Official Fansite of Michelle McCool
  • ScytherPodcasts.Net
    The new home of Beyond The Mat
  • ChrissyRivera.Net
    Official Website of Combat Zone Queen Chrissy Rivera
  • Devon-Moore.Net
    Official Website of Devon Moore
  • Site Friends
  • Kanes-Inferno.com
    Best source for Kane
  • TrishStratus.com
    Official Website of Trish Stratus
  • Chris-Jericho.org
    Official Fansite of Chris Jericho
  • Cena-Central.com
    Top Source for John Cena

  • Disclaimer
    Owner: Jen
    Founder: Dan (Opened 2003)
    Reporters: Anan & Ed
    Site Twitter: Click Here!
    Contact Site: E-Mail
    Host: Flaunt
    Design: Cristy
    This website is in no way affiliated with or linked to The Undertaker though we are Approved! The names of all World Wrestling Entertainment televised and live programming, talent names, images, likenesses, slogans, wrestling moves and all World Wrestling Entertainment logos and trademarks are the exclusive property of World Wrestling Entertainment. The images included on this site are being used under fair copyright law 107, no copyright infringement is intended. Please do not sue us, I dont have any money anyway so all you'd get is fluff.
    Views From The Turnbuckle: Why Are We Excited For Shane McMahon?

    The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the opinions of WrestlingInc or its staff.

    With WrestleMania breathing down the necks of WWE and numerous top stars sidelined with injuries, WWE was forced to enact what is in my opinion, a truly desperate plan. Vince McMahon brought his son, Shane McMahon back into the company as a babyface authority figure who will fight Vince for control of the company. Shane will literally be fighting at WrestleMania as he will face The Undertaker in a Hell in a Cell match for control of Monday Night Raw.

    I first found out about this storyline while I was driving back from covering a high school basketball game. The more I thought about the more insane it became to me. Desperate times call for desperate measures, but bringing back Shane to wrestle The Undertaker at WrestleMania? That was WWE’s grand plan to save the event? Shane hadn’t wrestled since 2009, was on the wrong side of 40 and frankly was not a very good wrestler when he was frequently working in the ring. On top of that, there were numerous holes in the storyline, mainly why the hell would The Undertaker wrestle for Vince McMahon?

    The last two episodes of Monday Night RAW following Shane’s return have not inspired my appreciation for this feud. Two weeks ago, The Undertaker appeared on RAW, presumably to explain his course of action and why he would be working for Vince in his time of need. Instead, The Undertaker came out, barely said anything, he just mentioned that Shane’s blood is on Vince’s hands. Why is The Undertaker working for Vince? We don’t know! WWE has no idea how to explain why the most beloved figure in the company is working for the bad guy, so they just completely ignored the question all together. There is a massive hole in the storyline and WWE simply doesn’t care to rectify it, trusting that fans will not be bothered by this massive loss of logic. As fans, I feel like we are responsible for the product that we get, if we accept WWE’s inability to tell a congruent story, then we are going to be continuously gifted with lazy and ineffective storytelling.

    Also, that doesn’t really touch on the fact that fans don’t really want to go to WrestleMania, in Texas, and boo The Undertaker. Particularly in a Hell in a Cell match, fans want to go to the stadium and watch The Undertaker kick some serious ass. By aligning The Undertaker with Vince, they are essentially turning him heel, which at this stage in the game is an impossible task. The Undertaker could tombstone a Make-a-Wish recipient in the middle of the ring and probably still get cheered.

    Then of course, there is the introduction of Shane McMahon into the feud. Shane apparently has some sort of power over Vince, due to a lockbox in some vault that has some sort of incriminating evidence against Vince. Will we ever find out what is in the lockbox? Probably not, just like The Undertaker working for Vince, the idea isn’t fleshed out in any realistic way, it simply a means to an end so that Shane has some leverage in the situation. Last Monday, Shane showed off his “skills” by laying a beat down on several members of security, throwing a flurry of weak-looking punches that wouldn’t have damaged Styrofoam. Despite his obvious ineptitude in the ring, Shane was booked to look like Brock Lesnar, laying waste to everyone in sight without hardly breaking a sweat.

    The thing about Shane is that in wrestling, absence really makes the heart grow fonder. The prevailing opinion currently, even among hardcore fans, is that Shane is this terrific performer who was a tremendous star in the early-2000s. The reality is that simply isn’t the case. Despite the mythologizing via YouTube that Shane has enjoyed, his in-ring career is most notable for getting beaten up repeatedly by Steve Blackman. Shane was not a good wrestler by any stretch of the imagination. He was however a terrific bump taker who was willing to risk his body in some hardcore matches, which earned him the respect of the fans. That is all true, and I like Shane and I was always entertained by his matches because of that, but the idea that at age 46 and having not wrestled since 2009 Shane is going to go toe-to-toe with The Undertaker and have this awesome match, doesn’t seem to have much credence.

    I think the reason I am upset about this feud is that once again, WWE is going back to the nostalgia well to aid their biggest show of the year. There is a roster of talented young performers that are busting their ass week-in and week-out for the company, and WWE slaps them in the face by giving the biggest match at WrestleMania to Vince’s son. It is a direct message to all those guys, essentially telling them that they are not over enough to warrant a position against The Undertaker, but someone who hasn’t appeared in WWE this decade is. WWE could still have Shane come back, still challenge Vince and still have The Undertaker represent Vince. Instead, Shane wouldn’t wrestle but rather pick a representative to fight for him, a younger star that would be involved in a top storyline that would help elevate them to the next level. WWE would still have the same momentum that they would have now with Shane’s return, but instead of having just Shane get over, they could aid a new star in getting over as well.

    Yet, I would be lying if I were to say that the storyline in its current incarnation is not effective. Despite the gaps in logic and the shortcomings of Shane as a performer, fans, both casual and hardcore, have fallen head-over-heels for Shane. He has gotten the biggest reaction on RAW every week since his debut and interest for WrestleMania has certainly picked up since his return. While I personally believe that there are a lot of issues with the current story, the masses have spoken and they say that the storyline has been successful so far, and that is what really matters.

    Shane is popular not only because he was a factor during WWE’s most successful period in company history and because he took some bumps. I think a big aspect of his popularity is that he really did leave the company in 2009 to pursue other business interests. Fans don’t like Vince, Stephanie and Triple H, in storyline and in real life, so Shane gets some credit from hardcore fans for leaving that triumvirate and striking out on his own. In a lot of ways Shane is a representative of fans frustrations with the current direction of the company, in his promos he is talking about declining business and poor booking, something fans feel the established order is responsible for. Fans believe that if Shane assumes control of the company, he will put an end to the terrible decisions being made by The Authority, both in kayfabe and in reality, and WWE will become a much more prosperous company.

    Of course, all of that storytelling is in storyline. Even if Shane wins at WrestleMania, Vince, Stephanie and Triple H are not going anywhere, they will still be calling all of the shots in the company. Sure, Shane might assume an on-air leadership role which would bring the end to the tireless Authority storyline, but the overall direction of the company isn’t going to change one iota. Hardcore fans should know this, yet some of them have convinced themselves that Shane REALLY is going to change things in WWE. According to Dave Meltzer, who spoke with many current and former WWE executives, while many of them personally liked Shane more than Stephanie or Triple H, it was admitted that Stephanie and Triple H clearly had a better handle of the business than Shane, which is why Shane left the company in 2010. Even if Shane were to assume some sort of real leadership role behind the scenes, the idea that he is a creative genius who is going to turn things around is both far-fetched and unproven.

    Shane certainly seems like a likeable guy and I certainly enjoyed seeing him return on RAW, but he isn’t the savior that the company needs. Like Steve Austin in the late 1990s, WWE needs an up-and-coming superstar that changes the game to lead them into a new direction and back into stratospheric heights, not an old-star whose reputation has outpaced his actual accomplishments.

    source: WrestlingINC

    I think the article contains some valid points. The first one being Taker vs Shane was made out of pure desperation. That’s more than obvious. With the Taker/Lesnar feud thankfully finally over, talents who would give Taker a run for his WM win are out injured, and everyone on the currently active roster is busy at WM or will be busy by the time we get there. Shane came back to “save us” from dealing with a WM without Taker, something that hasn’t been a reality since WM2000.(Prior to that, he missed WM10.)

    Another valid point is so far, we don’t know why Taker’s working for Vince. He came out and said the Shane’s blood will be on Vince’s blood. But that doesn’t explain why he’s working for him. Hopefully Taker will explain why during his next RAW appearance or at the absolute latest, at WM. No matter what he does, I don’t see a Taker heel turn from this point on onward. And even of he was a heel, he’s gonna be cheered in his home state of Texas at WM. Heels being cheered are seemingly common now as the art of distinguishing a face from a heel is one of the many lost arts of the business. Turning Taker heel now would result in Sting’s WCW heel turn in 1999. He’s so beloved, they cheered him forcing WCW to quickly turn him face and the same will result with Taker. Like Sting still is to WCW, Taker’s always been a WWE role model company loyalist, probably more than anyone, has been around too long, done too much, and is just too beloved to be a heel which WWE had more than enough time to do but never did and that’s probably because of how beloved he is.

    The article also echoed the point I made where it stated Shane hadn’t wrestled since 2009 and is older now at 40. While he may have been a decent wrestler for a part-timer, his strength(s) from a physical standpoint lied in his stunts and taking bumps and there’s more to wrestling than that. The fact is Shane wasn’t nor is he now good enough to be any kind of threat to Taker on his own which is why I believe he’ll employ help which may even lead to another Mcmahon Family screw job which we have seen more than once over the years. Shane’s been doing some great training. But as the old saying goes, time off is a wrestler’s worst enemy and Shane’s had over 5 years of time off. During that time, Taker, though he transitioned into part-timer, has still been kicking ass Deadman style every year.

    Those are the points I paid attention to. Thoughts on the article’s main points?

    Post Discussion
    • HTM on March 11th, 2016 says:

      “Shane was not a good wrestler by any stretch of the imagination. He was however a terrific bump taker who was willing to risk his body in some hardcore matches, which earned him the respect of the fans.”

      I agree.

    • Mike b on March 12th, 2016 says:

      Vince needs step down, he’s just ruining things for he’s old age, brings picture out of Shane steps on it just tell story hare Shane.. Vince has soo soo lot it, March doesn’t make any since for taker be in, even Shane wins if Vince and www offered long term contract it’ll be the same family thing, just Shane’s version. Vince really needs have some up coming roaster take on taker and there’s plenty of stars..

    • BamBam on March 12th, 2016 says:

      The whole Mcmahon has been lsoing it. Since they killed off the main competitor ,they have been on the decline since there is no new ideas to feed off from a rival. So ,fast forward today you see the results. Shane taking over will change anything? Not quite since you still have the same board of directors and HHH,Stephanie. Vince will be active from the background.
      Old stars or new stars doesnt matter they still managed to screw them up like they almost completely did to deadman.Hard job for taker to save this trainwreck of a match at 50yrs old. Looks like they are about to sacrifice the deadman in this match for shane mcmahon/vince storyline which was already seen a decade ago.HHH stepahanie power struggle..boohoo
      Hopefully that does not happen.

    • dhanish1979 on March 13th, 2016 says:

      I saw the wwe roadblock,i expected the undertaker to screw up brock or brock to screw up main event between triple h and dean ambrose and surprise entry of the undertaker seeking one last hope of battle between the undertaker vs brock lesnar at WM 32 i,e brock facing taker on behalf of shane but nothing happened yesterday night.Everything went fair and sqaure at roadblock.
      My biggest regret upon the undertaker for not getting clean pin on brock lesnar,I guess YOUSUF too will have to let it go,I am slowing trying to forget it now and get along with others,THAT’S ASSURED

    • Anan on March 13th, 2016 says:


      Good for you that you’re getting over it. I honestly did not see any reason for Lesnar to interfere, Taker to return and Lesnar to face Taker on behalf of Shane. Taker is set to face Shane. Shane was not at Roadblock. Shane has been training obviously because he wants to gain control by defeating Taker. Or at the very least until a swerve is done, that is what he expects Taker to believe.

      people keep asking what Taker has to gain. That’s simple. A win. Taker wants to compete against whoever and win. Why, especially now when he’s so healthy and WM being in Texas would he want to skip WM or go there to lose? This is of course from a storyline standpoint. In reality Taker does what’s best for business win or lose. He felt or had to be convinced that ending The Streak by Brock was best so he went with it whether he liked it or not.

      But what does Lesnar have to gain by taking Shane’s place? Lesnar would be facing a man he’s already beaten at WM and at HIAC. On top of that, there’s Vince Mcmahon. Vince is the one who made Shane vs Taker so I don’t believe he’ll allow Shane to find a replacement for himself. If he did, then he’d call the stipulation off. That stipulation being if Shane won, he’ll control RAW.

    • yousif on March 14th, 2016 says:

      Your thought was totally out of expectation and reality.
      Taker interfering in brocks match and facing him now!
      That’s more than impossible right now
      WWE already marketed their matched for Wm.
      But I am sure there will be another brock vs taker with totally new scenario during brocks remaining contract or before taker retires.
      And about letting go thing.:) It’s nothing like that. . I want taker vs brock again for more than one reason. 1 I love to see them against each other in the ring 2 taker should have a respectful end with this match series against brock . That’s a must for his career before the end . might not be a clean win although is the bets thing to do .
      I will never let it go . Lol

      What I have in mind . Is taker facing brock as his last match. In his retirement match .
      It will be good if he asks this match because he feels this is the only thing he didn’t accomplished in his long career. And MacMahon or Hyman agrees for the match on a condition that if he loosr he retires forever.
      Very similar to Shawn flair. Or taker Shawn.
      But things can be changed by giving taker the most shocking respectful emotional win that he deserves at that moment . we can even see a hand shake between brock n taker the thing we never say before.
      Despite winning this be the end of taker. This can be after 1 or 2 years

      For me this is creative idea for me ..
      This is my dream scene

    • yousif on March 14th, 2016 says:

      I have a question. For you . If you can answer me please.
      Now as only few matches might be left in takes career .
      Do you like or do not like to see him facing young wrestlers ?
      At this stage of his career?? And why

    • Mark Petrick on March 14th, 2016 says:

      To Everyone:

      The Undertaker is supposed to be appearing Live in Pittsburgh Tonight, my hometown!!! Cannot wait!!! 🙂

    • Mark Petrick on March 14th, 2016 says:

      To Everyone:

      I shouldn’t say that we might see the Undertaker Tonight because it might just be a Promo from him and not actually seeing him Live on TV. We can only hope though. We will find out Live Tonight, at the Consol Energy Center, in Pittsburgh, PA. 🙂

    • Anan on March 15th, 2016 says:


      I rather links not be posted. if I find anything, it’s my job to post it. That said, if links are posted, then I post them and give credit to the original poster. The difference between here and the forums is here, you can only post links. On the forums, you can post reports which you really shouldn’t though as it’s not the rules.


      I want Taker to have fresh, new challenges who are built as threats to him, who’ll give him a run for his money. There’s more than one good option on that side of things. The only veterans I want him to face are Kane, Rock, and especially, Kurt Angle, Jericho and most especially, Sting.

    • Mark Petrick on March 15th, 2016 says:

      To Anan:

      I thought I wasn’t allowed to post links. Thanks for letting me know and sorry about that. 🙂

    • Damac on March 17th, 2016 says:

      When WWE planned for the Lender win, I don’t think they understood the consequences. Undertaker’s winning streak was a BIG draw. While I can understand why Undertaker lost, I just don’t think WWE had a logical after plan. Shane versus the Undertaker is problematic, for it currently feels hollow. WWE can change the story by giving Shane an enforcer. Since the match is in a ‘Hell in a Cell’, the ‘no disqualification’ clause is an opportunity. Can this open the door for something big? Cena? Sting? Could the whole lockeroom come out? Unless they have something big planned, I don’t think the match will overall work.